Saturday, November 18, 2017

UN Resolutions Targeting Israel and the Palestinians ( #No2AIPAC ) #BDS

UN Resolutions Targeting Israel and the Palestinians

Israel is the target of at least 77 UN Resolutions
and the Palestinians are the target of 1.

Number of UN Resolutions Passed in CondemnationIsraelPalestinians0255075100
CategoryIsraelisPalestinians
Israel77
Palestinians1

Aside from the core issues—refugees, Jerusalem, borders—the major themes reflected in the U.N. resolutions against Israel over the years are its unlawful attacks on its neighbors; its violations of the human rights of the Palestinians, including deportations, demolitions of homes and other collective punishments; its confiscation of Palestinian land; its establishment of illegal settlements; and its refusal to abide by the U.N. Charter and the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War.
Source: United Nations Security Council resolutions passed from 1955 through 1992 were detailed in Paul Findley’s book Deliberate Deceptions(1998, pages 192-4). Resolutions passed from 1993-2013 were accessed at UN.org.

UN Resolutions Against Israel, 1955-2013

  1. Resolution 106: "...‘condemns’ Israel for Gaza raid"
  2. Resolution 111: "...‘condemns’ Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people"
  3. Resolution 127: "...‘recommends’ Israel suspend its ‘no-man’s zone’ in Jerusalem"
  4. Resolution 162: "...‘urges’ Israel to comply with UN decisions"
  5. Resolution 171: "...determines flagrant violations’ by Israel in its attack on Syria"
  6. Resolution 228: "...‘censures’ Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control"
  7. Resolution 237: "...‘urges’ Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees"
  8. Resolution 248: "...‘condemns’ Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan"
  9. Resolution 250: "...‘calls on’ Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem"
  10. Resolution 251: "...‘deeply deplores’ Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250"
  11. Resolution 252: "...‘declares invalid’ Israel’s acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital"
  12. Resolution 256: "...‘condemns’ Israeli raids on Jordan as ‘flagrant violation"
  13. Resolution 259: "...‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation"
  14. Resolution 262: "...‘condemns’ Israel for attack on Beirut airport"
  15. Resolution 265: "...‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks for Salt in Jordan"
  16. Resolution 267: "...‘censures’ Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem"
  17. Resolution 270: "...‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon"
  18. Resolution 271: "...‘condemns’ Israel’s failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem"
  19. Resolution 279: "...‘demands’ withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon"
  20. Resolution 280: "....‘condemns’ Israeli’s attacks against Lebanon"
  21. Resolution 285: "...‘demands’ immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon"
  22. Resolution 298: "...‘deplores’ Israel’s changing of the status of Jerusalem"
  23. Resolution 313: "...‘demands’ that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon"
  24. Resolution 316: "...‘condemns’ Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon"
  25. Resolution 317: "...‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon"
  26. Resolution 332: "...‘condemns’ Israel’s repeated attacks against Lebanon"
  27. Resolution 337: "...‘condemns’ Israel for violating Lebanon’s sovereignty"
  28. Resolution 347: "...‘condemns’ Israeli attacks on Lebanon"
  29. Resolution 425: "...‘calls on’ Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon"
  30. Resolution 427: "...‘calls on’ Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon’
  31. Resolution 444: "...‘deplores’ Israel’s lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces"
  32. Resolution 446: "...‘determines’ that Israeli settlements are a ‘serious obstruction’ to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention"
  33. Resolution 450: "...‘calls on’ Israel to stop attacking Lebanon"
  34. Resolution 452: "...‘calls on’ Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories"
  35. Resolution 465: "...‘deplores’ Israel’s settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel’s settlements program"
  36. Resolution 467: "...‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s military intervention in Lebanon"
  37. Resolution 468: "...‘calls on’ Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return"
  38. Resolution 469: "...‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s failure to observe the council’s order not to deport Palestinians"
  39. Resolution 471: "...‘expresses deep concern’ at Israel’s failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention"
  40. Resolution 476: "...‘reiterates’ that Israel’s claims to Jerusalem are ‘null and void’
  41. Resolution 478: "...‘censures (Israel) in the strongest terms’ for its claim to Jerusalem in its ‘Basic Law’
  42. Resolution 484: "...‘declares it imperative’ that Israel re-admit two deported Palestinian mayors"
  43. Resolution 487: "...‘strongly condemns’ Israel for its attack on Iraq’s nuclear facility"
  44. Resolution 497: "...‘decides’ that Israel’s annexation of Syria’s Golan Heights is ‘null and void’ and demands that Israel rescind its decision forthwith"
  45. Resolution 498: "...‘calls on’ Israel to withdraw from Lebanon"
  46. Resolution 501: "...‘calls on’ Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops"
  47. Resolution 509: "...‘demands’ that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon"
  48. Resolution 515: "...‘demands’ that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in"
  49. Resolution 517: "...‘censures’ Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon"
  50. Resolution 518: "...‘demands’ that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon"
  51. Resolution 520: "...‘condemns’ Israel’s attack into West Beirut"
  52. Resolution 573: "...‘condemns’ Israel ‘vigorously’ for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters
  53. Resolution 587: "...‘takes note’ of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw"
  54. Resolution 592: "...‘strongly deplores’ the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops"
  55. Resolution 605: "...‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians
  56. Resolution 607: "...‘calls on’ Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention
  57. Resolution 608: "...‘deeply regrets’ that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians"
  58. Resolution 636: "...‘deeply regrets’ Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians
  59. Resolution 641: "...‘deplores’ Israel’s continuing deportation of Palestinians
  60. Resolution 672: "...‘condemns’ Israel for violence against Palestinians at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount
  61. Resolution 673: "...‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to cooperate with the United Nations
  62. Resolution 681: "...‘deplores’ Israel’s resumption of the deportation of Palestinians
  63. Resolution 694: "...‘deplores’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return
  64. Resolution 726: "...‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians
  65. Resolution 799: "...‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return
  66. Resolution 904: "...‘strongly condemns’ the massacre in Hebron and its aftermath which took the lives of more than 50 Palestinian civilians and injured several hundred others"
  67. Resolution 1073: "...‘calls for’ the immediate cessation and reversal of all acts which have resulted in the aggravation of the situation, ‘calls for‘ the safety and protection of Palestinian civilians to be ensured"
  68. Resolution 1322: "...‘condemns’ acts of violence, especially the excessive use of force against Palestinians, resulting in injury and loss of human life"
  69. Resolution 1402: "...‘calls upon’ both parties to move immediately to a meaningful ceasefire; calls for the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Palestinian cities, including Ramallah"
  70. Resolution 1403: "...‘demands’ the implementation of its resolution 1402 (2002) without delay"
  71. Resolution 1405: "...‘emphasizes’ the urgency of access of medical and humanitarian organizations to the Palestinian civilian population"
  72. Resolution 1435: "...‘demands’ that Israel immediately cease measures in and around Ramallah including the destruction of Palestinian civilian and security infrastructure"
  73. Resolution 1544: "...‘calls on’ Israel to respect its obligations under international humanitarian law, and insists, in particular, on its obligation not to undertake demolition of homes contrary to that law"
  74. Resolution 1860: "...‘calls for’ an immediate, durable and fully respected ceasefire, leading to the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza; ‘calls for‘ the unimpeded provision and distribution throughout Gaza of humanitarian assistance, including of food, fuel and medical treatment"
  75. Resolution 1937: "...‘urges’ the Government of Israel to expedite the withdrawal of its army from northern Ghajar without further delay"
  76. Resolution 2004: "...‘urges’ the Government of Israel to expedite the withdrawal of its army from northern Ghajar without further delay"
  77. Resolution 2064: "...‘urges’ the Government of Israel to expedite the withdrawal of its army from northern Ghajar without further delay"

UN Resolutions Against the Palestinians, 1955-2013


  1. Resolution 1435: "...‘calls on’ the Palestinian Authority to meet its expressed commitment to ensure that those responsible for terrorist acts are brought to justice by it"

Friday, November 17, 2017

Last year the U.S. gave Israel $3.7 billion – about $10.14 million per day of "Your Money"

Memorandum on the New 10-Year
$38 billion U.S. Aid Package to Israel

ALT TEXT
Starting in 2019, the U.S. will give Israel $38 billion over the next 10 years – $3.8 billion per year, which is $10.41 million per day.
This is in line with previous years. Last year the U.S. gave Israel $3.7 billion – about $10.14 million per day. In other words, the new aid package amounts to an increase of around $27 million per year.
Israel has long received more U.S. money than any other country. Some earlier disbursements were even larger when considered in today’s dollars.
This aid to Israel amounts to more than half of all direct military aid the United States provides worldwide.
The new agreement will slowly phase out a unique Israeli privilege: Israel’s exception to the requirement that all U.S. military aid be used on American goods and services (40% of military aid to Israel is currently exempted). This special exemption is supposed to end by the seventh year.
It is expected that Israel and Israeli companies will work to get around this potential loss of revenue in a number of ways:
  • forming “partnerships” with American companies;
  • increasing the practice of requiring that some of the systems Israel purchases from American companies include Israeli-made components;
  • increasing the amount of materiel and other goods in general that the U.S. purchases from Israel, already far from negligible.
Under the agreement Israel promises not to not ask for additional money; however, this promise includes loopholes:
  1. Israel may ask for more money if there is a “war.” (Israel’s 2014 invasion of Gaza – during which its forces killed over 2,200 Gazans, over a third of them women and children, and Palestinian resistance fighters killed 67 Israelis – was frequently called a “war.”)
  2. The great many Congressional representatives who are personally pro-Israel or who wish to curry favor with pro-Israel donors and media may independently vote additional money to Israel. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has already indicated that he intends to do just this.
Aid to Israel is technically illegal, violating U.S. regulations prohibiting U.S. aid to non-signatories to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. There is currently a lawsuit pending in Washington DC challenging the disbursement of this aid.
The American public is not in favor of this aid to Israel. A recent surveyshowed that almost two-thirds of American voters feel that the U.S. gives Israel too much moneys. Numerous surveys over the years found that approximately two-thirds to three-quarters don’t wish the U.S. to take sides on Israel-Palestine.
The agreement is in the form of a “memorandum of understanding.” It is not a treaty and is not legally binding. American voters have the right to demand that the MoU be abandoned and that the aid end.
#

Media Roots Radio – Fox News/Trump Alignment, Terror Fear-mongering & The Return of Post-9/11 Fascism

 

Media Roots Radio – Fox News/Trump Alignment, Terror Fear-mongering & The Return of Post-9/11 Fascism

Robbie Martin talks about the media's hyper-focus on vehicular mass-killings,  the Trump Administration's interest in returning to post-9/11 'freedoms,' and an unconventional route to fascism from Media Roots Radio.
 
 
 

Hollywood Breaks the Silence on Sexual Assault, Rape & Abuse

Robbie and Abby Martin discuss the recent influx of sexual assault allegations in Hollywood against Harvey Weinstein and others, and how a changing culture is taking powerful men down on Media Roots Radio.
 
 

Russia Trolls United States into Censoring the Internet & Full McCarthyism to Destroy the Left

Robbie and Abby Martin discuss corporate media's obsession with Russian hysteria despite the public's indifference, as well as Neoliberals' eagerness to protect their status on Media Roots Radio.
 
Pornography & Sex Work is a Radical Act w/ Conner Habib
Robbie Martin interviews author Conner Habib, host of podcast 'Against Everyone with Conner Habib,' about the genuine subversive nature of sex work,  the left's tendency to get in the way of that progress, and the need to decriminalize sex work on Media Roots Radio.
 

ESCWA report “Israeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid”

Powerful resignation letter by UN’s Rima Khalaf about removal of UN apartheid report

Powerful resignation letter by UN’s Rima Khalaf about removal of UN apartheid report
From Jadaliyya
The following is the resignation letter by ESWA Executive Secretary Rima Khalaf in response to the formal request by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres that ESCWA withdraw the publication of a scholarly report (below) that found Israel guilty of apartheid.
Dear Mr. Secretary-General,
I have carefully considered your message conveyed through the Chef de Cabinet and assure you that at no point have I questioned your right to order the withdrawal of the report from our website or the fact that all of us working in the Secretariat are subject to the authority of its Secretary-General. Nor do I have any doubts regarding your commitment to human rights in general, or your firm position regarding the rights of the Palestinian people. I also understand the concerns that you have, particularly in these difficult times that leave you little choice.
I am not oblivious to the vicious attacks and threats the UN and you personally were subjected to from powerful Member States as a result of the publication of the ESCWA report “Israeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid”. I do not find it surprising that such Member States, who now have governments with little regard for international norms and values of human rights, will resort to intimidation when they find it hard to defend their unlawful policies and practices. It is only normal for criminals to pressure and attack those who advocate the cause of their victims.  I cannot submit to such pressure.
Not by virtue of my being an international official, but simply by virtue of being a decent human being, I believe, like you, in the universal values and principles that have always been the driving force for good in human history, and on which this organization of ours, the United Nations is founded. Like you, I believe that discrimination against anyone due to their religion, skin color, sex or ethnic origin is unacceptable, and that such discrimination cannot be rendered acceptable by the calculations of political expediency or power politics. I also believe people should not only have the freedom to speak truth to power, but they have the duty to do so.
In the space of two months you have instructed me to withdraw two reports produced by ESCWA, not due to any fault found in the reports and probably not because you disagreed with their content, but due to the political pressure by member states who gravely violate the rights of the people of the region.
You have seen first hand that the people of this region are going through a period of suffering unparalleled in their modern history; and that the overwhelming flood of catastrophes today is the result of a stream of injustices that were either ignored, plastered over, or openly endorsed by powerful governments inside and outside the region. Those same governments are the ones pressuring you to silence the voice of truth and the call for justice represented in these reports.
Given the above, I cannot but stand by the findings of ESCWA’s report that Israel has established an apartheid regime that seeks the domination of one racial group over another. The evidence provided by this report drafted by renowned experts is overwhelming. Suffice it to say that none of those who attacked the report had a word to say about its content. I feel it my duty to shed light on the legally inadmissible and morally indefensible fact that an apartheid regime still exists in the 21st century rather than suppressing the evidence. In saying this I claim no moral superiority nor ownership of a more prescient vision. My position might be informed by a lifetime of experiencing the dire consequences of blocking peaceful channels to addressing people’s grievances in our region.
After giving the matter due consideration, I realized that I too have little choice. I cannot withdraw yet another well-researched, well-documented UN work on grave violations of human rights, yet I know that clear instructions by the Secretary-General will have to be implemented promptly. A dilemma that can only be resolved by my stepping down to allow someone else to deliver what I am unable to deliver in good conscience.  I know that I have only two more weeks to serve; my resignation is therefore not intended for political pressure. It is simply because I feel it my duty towards the people we serve, towards the UN and towards myself, not to withdraw an honest testimony about an ongoing crime that is at the root of so much human suffering. Therefore, I hereby submit to you my resignation from the United Nations.
Respectfully
Rima Khalaf
Below is the report, which has been removed from the UN website.

Saturday, November 11, 2017

The Truth About “Veterans Day” A ‘VETERANS DAY’ FLASHBACK

The Truth About “Veterans Day”

‘VETERANS DAY’ FLASHBACK

11-11-1918
Most Americans know November 11 as “Veterans Day” — the day we honor the poor chumps who have “died for our freedom” (barf), as well as the living ones who knew not and know not of dark powers that misuse the Department of Offense. We do not intend that in any way as an insult to our vets — but that is the tragic historical reality of the situation, whether one can handle the truth or not. 
But what few people know is that the date originated as, and still coincides with, “Armistice Day” — commemorated every year to mark the armistice signed between the Allies of World War I and Germany in a railway carriage at Compiègne, France.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/Armisticetrain_%28slight_crop%29.jpghttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cd/Waffenstillstand_gr.jpg  https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/1918Toronto_BayandKing_Armistace_Day.jpg
Make a mental note of the famous railway carriage of 11-11-1918. It is where Germany was tricked into capitulating, triggering celebrations throughout France, the U.K. and the U.S.
The official cessation of hostilities on the Western Front of World War I took effect at eleven o’clock in the morning—the “eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month” 11-11-11 of 1918. Off topic here for a moment, but three decades later, the Allied “D-Day” (Devil’s Day) invasion of Normandy was launched at the “sixth hour of the sixth day of the sixth month” of 1944 — 6-6-6Globalists just love their Satanic symbolism, don’t they?
As the top-of-page headline of the 1918 Sulzberger’s Slimes shows – (yes, even back then, the Ochs-Sulzberger Crime Family owned “the paper of record’!”) – Berlin was immediately “Seized by Revolutionists” (Communists). Leading the “German” counterparts of the murderous “Russian” Bolsheviks who had already seized Petrograd / St. Petersburg and other areas of Russia (October 1917, “Red October”) were Rosa Luxemburg (cough-cough) and Karl Liebknecht (cough-cough).
To make a long story short, the Red Revolution was quickly put down by the brave volunteers of the German “Freikorps.” Red Rosa and Kommie Karl soon got what was coming to them. In 1919, the bitch was beaten with rifle butts and thrown into a nearby river, while Liebknecht was forced to step out of the car he was being transported in and then shot.
https://web.stanford.edu/dept/german/berlin_class/people/images/liebknecht_luxemburg.jpeghttps://rosaluxemburgblog.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/otto-runge-eden-hotel.jpg
1- Arrogant Communists Luxemburg and Liebknecht strut through Berlin, thinking they were about to brutally lord over defeated Germany. The heroic Freikorps boys put an end to that notion!
2- Freikorps boys party it up after taking care of business. (Wish these MEN would come back and show their pussified great grandsons how to take care of the “migrants” — and Merkel too!)
Though spared from Communist takeover, Germany could not be saved from the cruel punishment of the Jewish-banker-dictated Treaty of Versailles which was to come. The loss of territory, the “ethnic cleansing” of Western Prussia, the isolation of Eastern Prussia, the hunger, the hyper-inflation, the imposed war guilt, the debauchery and degradation of the Weimar Republic years and so much more — it all began with the inexplicable and total surrender of 11-11-18.
We say “inexplicable” because, at the time of the armistice / surrender, not one square inch of German territory had been occupied by the Allies. Though it is certainly true that the tide of war had begun to turn (due to America’s entry), there was no need to capitulate so easily — not when 120,000 Americans had already died after just 7 months of fighting (70,000 combat / 50,000 Spanish Flu / other) with an additional 200,000 wounded!
http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2010/top10_dates/veterans_day.jpg  http://kickassfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/HitlerMustache.jpg
A certain highly-decorated and twice-injured (badly) war hero was not pleased by the treason of 11-11-1918 and its horrible aftermath. He took to political activism in order to right the wrongs.
“We must call to account the November Criminals of 1918. It cannot be that two million Germans should have fallen in vain and that afterwards one should sit down as friends at the same table with traitors. No, we do not pardon, we demand – Vengeance! ”
 Hitler, Munich Speech, September 1922
So, who or what forces prompted Germany’s bizarre decision to just lay down its substantial arms and suddenly retreat from the Western frontiers? Three groups:
1. The internal force of Jewish-led Marxists (Luxemburg, Liebknecht et al) and ambitious libtards who wanted Germany to lose and become a “democracy” or even a full blown Communist state.
2. The internal force of Zionists (who overlapped with #1) who wanted Germany to lose so that British forces could be freed up to take Palestine away from Ottoman Turkey — Germany’s ally.
3. The internal force of deluded war-weary German fools who blindly trusted in Woodrow Wilson’s empty promises of a fair and just “peace without victors.”
http://www.tomatobubble.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/.pond/4917220.jpg.w300h204.jpg  http://www.tomatobubble.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/dolchstoss.jpg
fter the capitulation and collapse of Germany, the Jewish-led home front betrayal – which cost the German military the war – came to be known as “The Stab in the Back” — depicted in 1920’s cartoons above.
 
As readers of “The Bad War” (here) and/or regular subscribers to The Anti-New York Times already know; the railroad car armistice / treason of 11-11-1918 did not sit well with The Great One (that’s Hitler for all you newbies and normies). When the Judeo-British-French troublemakers started their crap again in 1939-1940, the revived German Reich put a quick end to World War II on the European continent — or so it seemed until Stalin and FDR got into the act. And where do you think The Great One arranged for the signing of the 1940 armistice with France to take place? Have a look at the scene:
http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/images/Bild%20146-1982-089-18_web.jpg  https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-M1112-500,_Waffenstillstand_von_Compi%C3%A8gne,_Hitler,_G%C3%B6ring.jpg  https://iconicphotos.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/jig_1.jpg?w=700
Back to the same railway carriage! Who’s “badder” (in a good way) than The Great One? No one!
 
Unfortunately for Germany, Europe, and the whole world, Germany’s victory in 1940 was short-lived. And the subsequent post-war punishment of Germany would make the post-World War I horrors seem merciful by comparison. The world is still suffering today from the New World Order which was constructed upon the corpses of the many millions who died in those closely-related genocides that were the two wars.
 
The traitors and fools who delivered Germany to disaster in 1918 set the “world stage”  for the horrors that are still unfolding to this day — and could lead to World War III if the Globalists can topple Trump. What a mess they made in 1918! That is why The Great One coined the term, “The November Criminals” to describe this greasy and pathetic bunch who signed onto 11-11-18. And that is also why your intrepid reporter and his fearless feline side-kick will most certainly not be commemorating “Veterans Day.”
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51555lvIW5L.jpg  http://static.thecia.com.au/reviews/1/11-11-hell-s-gate-poster-0.jpg  https://wonderopolis.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Veterans_Day_flag_xl_60917020_(Custom).jpg
They love to toy with us with their symbols, hints, and demonic numerolgy.